Message:

Remove ads from this guestbook - starting at just EUR2,50
3:38am 12-17-2014
Feliks
Santa Claus is always something for Christmas will bring a gift. This year a new type of Venturi nozzle ..
Christmassy greetings



Andrew
9:58pm 11-18-2014
Feliks
Here are the materials you can download a PDF of the conference .. I am at the end of the first day, as it was in the schedule
Expo Engine 2014

PDF

http://www.ukintpress-conferences.com/conf/14exna_conf/download.php?conf_id=152&sess_id=1983&view=drill
5:07am 11-09-2014
Feliks
Greetings to all from the Engine Expo 2014 in Novi Detroit ....







6:44pm 11-01-2014
Peggy West
Was very nice to meet you (Mini U Storage, Novi - car storage), you're a wonderful man. Good luck in your travels and stay safe.
3:51pm 08-31-2014
Feliks
And here's how it looks in the original .. It is not enough to come up with a way to the engine ... still need to know how to realize ... only together give a true effect ..



Andrew
3:50pm 08-31-2014
Feliks
Here historical figure .. then only the best solution was graph paper .. Figure was every day for 1 month used, when did this lathe crankshaft. The crankshaft has five supports and four crank, 90 degrees .. starting weight of the material (iron containing 5% cobalt) was 80 kg (160 lb) is the world's first practical crankshaft timing ..



Andrew
3:03am 05-18-2014
Feliks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bocolo View Post
But the wings will be damaged when they start banging each other. Right? /

No Bocolo, this film is just a demonstration, designed to show that between wings have been observed even small wind evolves very large force, which causes a vacuum. . It falls, but sparkled with momentum hits for himself .. because a large force was driven to such behavior. Of course, between the wings should give solid struts, which will determine the distance between them, chosen in the laboratory and Unclassifiable biggest Underpressure .. Then the vacuum should enter into the slit inside the wings of NACA FELIKS and further from the center of the wings for the help of some pipes, where we will be the most comfortable .. Of course at the end of the pipes have to give some engines vacuum, for example, a simple turbine, or a vane pump working as a motor ....

Andrew
2:56am 05-18-2014
Feliks
And now the strangest thing .. On the screen shots from the simulator to the airfoil published by NASA, pointed red frame so strange two values that can be set on the simulator .. Namely, in terms of drag and lift. and would not have believed in their value, if not the simulator, which included such a serious company like NASA .. In the first image you can see that the drag is set to 21 Newton.Lift has until 244 Newton .... So for the help of a smaller force is a much more powerful .. Something with anything ... this force is with 11.6 times greater than the resistance (drag).

In the second figure also drag is 12 Newtons, and lift 191 Newtons .. ie with 15.9 times greater ..
I think that these simulations are accurate ..
Now, if even half of the value obtained for lift holding strength to produce the drug's effects, it would lift force will be very high ... So we use 85 Newtons of lift to overcome the resistance (drag) 12 Newtons. that is enough for us to capture power efficiency, and conversion to drag about 14%. (eg rotary vane pump + propeller). I think it is really to do with such a small sufficient efficiency .. So the system can move itself by overcoming drag and float in the air At 85 Newtons lift .. I guess that NASA is wrong ...
So says the theory .....





Andrew
2:56am 05-18-2014
Feliks
Here drawings like two wings facing each other bellies they give huge wind acceleration and negative pressure which we introduce inside the wings. If the wings will be mounted permanently, with sufficient clearance between them, and may be greater plenty of slots, a big part of the lift force will turn on underpressure which will be inside the wings could create a fairly low pressure and large its quantitative yield .. If so it will already know how to use a vacuum with a good efficiency, for example by the vane pump is running, vacuum-as a motor ... the motor can drive the generators or.... propeller ...

2:41am 05-18-2014
Feliks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bocolo View Post
But the wings will be damaged when they start banging each other. Right? /

No Bocolo, this film is just a demonstration, designed to show that between wings have been observed even small wind evolves very large force, which causes a vacuum. . It falls, but sparkled with momentum hits for himself .. because a large force was driven to such behavior. Of course, between the wings should give solid struts, which will determine the distance between them, chosen in the laboratory and Unclassifiable biggest Underpressure .. Then the vacuum should enter into the slit inside the wings of NACA FELIKS and further from the center of the wings for the help of some pipes, where we will be the most comfortable .. Of course at the end of the pipes have to give some engines vacuum, for example, a simple turbine, or a vane pump working as a motor ....
2:40am 05-18-2014
Feliks
Well think again about the Red Baron. something on you tube not much you can see these vibrations..

The effect of two teaspoons on the wings of aviation profile facing each other stomachs. Wind from an ordinary hair dryer ... you can hear the clatter of high-frequency wing strokes of each other. That is, the vacuum, despite the very light wind is enormous. Disappears, as the wings come closer and then again .. Hence arises the clatter.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10203982831115507&l=2864657966928125097

Andrew
11:53am 05-13-2014
Feliks
Quote Originally Posted by Power5 View Post
Wow I am unsubscribing now. I have absolutely no idea what you were trying to say in the last post. Maximum takeoff weight of a 747 is indeed over 900,000 lbs meaning the maximum weight needed to FLOAT, if it crashes into one of your easy to find body of waters, is 900,000 lbs. You keep mentioning empty weight and calling yourself an engineer. You need to work from worst case scenario for engineering not best case.

via my Note 3
So the maximum takeoff weight is 900 ... 000 pounds .. but this is 400 000 pouds fuel which can take with each other on the flight .. And now if you want to land at the airport, the weights can not exceed the Maximum landing weight . if exceeds the value of the fuel to be released before landing .. I assume that the landing on the water also should land the aircraft without fuel . So the buoyancy should you protect 555,000 pounds to the weight . Now empty the tanks operate this same preferred to buoyancy . So we have to subtract the weight of the displacement of these tanks or 350 000 pounds of buoyancy . Now 555 000 pounds minus the 350 000 gives us 205 000 pounds. Also with this burden should be removed buoyancy metal aircraft, which is made from aluminiu m , or 7,000 pounds. M ^ 3 . Now quantity is 205 000 divided by 7000 gives us ~ 30 m ^ 3 buoyancy will give us aluminum. That is 60 000 pounds , we can subtract . Sumary is 205000 minus 60 000 = 145 000 pounds to buoyancy , or 70 meters cubic of foam .. and 747 after draining the fuel floats 100% Together with the luggage and peoples..

LD1 and luggage container is almost ~~ 5 m ^ 3 or 14 containers of foam sufficient to provide buoyancy once already built 747. Everybody takes a plane 32 such containers LD1. .

http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/com...f/747_perf.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LD3
11:48am 05-13-2014
Feliks
Those who stand in the wings afraid of the plane can sink .. If they knew that the plane does not sink .. they would have been in the middle of the aircraft. and so much stress would not survive ..

aaaaa

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747

Yes and empty fuel tanks, will have a displacement of 400 000 pouds, that you only need to protect the 200 000 pouds buoyancy to swim and then the plane at 100% will not sink
11:44am 05-13-2014
Feliks
Quote Originally Posted by Power5 View Post
I have tried to read all your posts as if written by a person nearly black out drunk but I ha e no idea what you are trying to say in the last 2. I like how all your "wasted space" pictures show spaces nearly completely filled. Again a 747 is 900,000 pounds. That is a lot of foam needed to float. Please use float instead of swim. Planes don't swim. Neither do boats. There are numerous translate sites. Find one or at least find a new one.

via my Note 3/Quote

I I see the data stating the weight of the aircraft, give false information .. apparently you want to convince me that this plane but can not swim. Do not know what you have in this business, or humiliation to me as an engineer, whether people like to be melted and aircraft in oceans die .. Because only the two causes of your weight falsification of view ... And I, however, fortresses that can .. There is such a parameter, which they report is not even in this article in wikipedia The maximum weight of the aircraft for landing .. So how has too much fuel, it must drain .. 747 is 400, 000 pounds of fuel .. ie much less can have while charging their weight, whether it will land at the airport, or on the ocean. The best example is the "miracle on the Hudson", from the aircraft even without the foam can swim .. As if he got some more foam, then you certainly will not sink. And this can be packed in this portable luggage space .. Here a picture of this that can ..
11:42am 05-13-2014
Feliks
Well, unfortunately, it is impossible to quickly enter such changes to this foam to fill the empty spaces of the aircraft. You have to do the best aircraft production. But for existing aircraft, you can enter such a recommendation to aircraft flying over the sea, could "complement your luggage hatch, depending on its use, such LD3 containers filled with polystyrene foam, which like the 787 and puts the 20 to free space Baggage, presumably, property owned by swimming in the water. this is the case only the relevant rules and then we have security at increased significantly

aaaaa
Messages: 61 until 75 of 406.
Number of pages: 28
Newer2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8Older