Remove ads from this guestbook - starting at just €2,50
8:55am 10-07-2013
Super strona, bardzo dużo ciekawych informacji, na pewno jeszcze tu wrócę
4:32pm 09-24-2013
please tell me about the some limitations of new four stroke engine sir.
5:49pm 09-01-2013
Such a thing you have to use the Windmill Red Baron .. It is much more effective and efficient than a fan, which I used in my prototype .. because I used it because I wanted it to be seen from fast shakes due to the negative pressure produced .. Also each vane pump can be used, even with the water ring seal.

It is obviously too can drive the propeller :rolleyes:
4:13pm 08-29-2013
And if so the nozzle still has a small venturi with a propeller ...
You only need to do some brake to be able to land safely ..
.. :rolleyes:


Now not just a wing equipped with NACA-FELIKS profile and you can drive the turbine that is small, around larger propeller for propelling the aircraft .. (For some small gears sure) I think these two films, for people who have enough imagination to understand the principles and authenticate the actual work of such a system, which is probably exempt me of the need for prototyping ..
All the praise can enter below ...
2:02pm 08-25-2013
Jeffrey Kupiec
Interesting design, has any emissions testing been completed on the exhaust gases?

The levels of gases in your design verses the "conventional 4 stroke" engine?

6:23am 08-12-2013
suyash raj
pleas send me new inventions
1:52pm 08-10-2013
Devil is not so terrible as he is painted..

Lest there be any lack of clarity...

1:51pm 08-10-2013
And here is the airplane ... Hunting H.126. ... With his performance shows the unit load on the wing is about 250 Kg per 1 square meter .... Now, your personal car has an area average 1.8 x 4 = 7.2 m square ... and weighs 1200 KG have any. So on one square meter. ie 1 m square around 166 kg, which is much less than in the plane. which is very likely that should begin with the car have to go over the road, at any speed of 40 km / h ... ... Because aircraft N-126 mimics the speed 51 km / h (32 mph). So that your car properly equipped with such parameters would have glide above the road ... Just what does that say manufacture shock absorbers ... So any, of the principle of conservation of energy?

2:44pm 08-07-2013
Peltier I started to deal with in 1993, in a small laboratory scale.In the following years I did in the mid-scale laboratory I made such a demonstration, where the yen element size 50mmm x50mm is placed on an aluminum bracket, on the other hand, covered with a copper plaque, located to the heat from a finger could easily trickle out over the entire surface of the ceramic peltier.

Also done once a thermometer measuring the wireless side of aluminum and copper hand when I touched her finger. It turned out that the temperature difference was only 2 to 3 degrees Celsius, and has to show voltage of tens of millivolts, as a result of the heat of the finger ... Despite the fact that we do not need to produce electricity already heated water, replace it on steam, drive turbines ing or reciprocating engine, then the generator, electricity can receive this very simple method and a minimum temperature difference ..
Well, for example, temperature 2 meters under the ground and air temperature of 30 degrees Celsius .. The outside can be also negatynie 20 degrees Celsius, and the resulting current changes polarity only ... And here again joke .. The greater this negative temperature, the greater the difference in the temperature of 2 meters below the surface (about 7 degrees)and you get more power .. so I dreamed we would have this .. the bigger the frost, we have more energy ..And here the principle of T1-T2 / T1 does not look to the end was a real .... For where, for example, we have in the way of the physical size of the time? because there is a fundamental difference if you have time 0.01 sec or 10000 sec .... a rhetorical question ...

2:44pm 08-07-2013
Now you can go back to my engine project new4stroke that you very much approve of ..

[quote]Friction[edit source | editbeta]

An engine has many moving parts that produce friction. Some of these friction forces remain constant (as long as applied load is constant); some of these friction losses increase as engine speed increases, such as piston side forces and connecting bearing forces (due to increased inertia forces from the oscillating piston). A few friction forces decrease at higher speed, such as the friction force on the cam's lobes used to operate the inlet and outlet valves (the valves' inertia at high speed tends to pull the cam follower away from the cam lobe). Along with friction forces, an operating engine has pumping losses, which is the work required to move air into and out of the cylinders. This pumping loss is minimal at low speed, but increases approximately as the square of the speed, until at rated power an engine is using about 20% of total power production to overcome friction and pumping losses.[/quote]

And now this. My engine new4stroke is the most vital advantage, even though it does not appear on any animation ..
Many people have spoken out about the efficiency of four-stroke engine, was stating with such engine already reached peaks of efficiency possible, and to get it to improve by 2% "The great issue" about three bilion dollars a year on research ..
Because they thought impossible, that you can make a difference when it comes to basic parameter or friction, which presented the current position of Wikipedia.
Meanwhile, my engine, changing the ratio of friction to the size of the intake air through the engine. So, but it's something that everyone seemed so far out that is constant and unchanging.
And here's the joke ... my engine, even though it is built on a base the size of a two-cylinder engine, 600 ccm, geometrically speaking, sucks about 950 ccm ... (in fact much greater).
So as if normal engine but with an additional 3 1/6 cylinder .. but the cylinder does not. This increase in the displacement give only two intake valves piston located in the cylinder head. And there may be nothing revolutionary, were it not that these pistons with rods they turn TWO TIMES slower than the basic pistons ... In connection with this, the force of inertia, which is realized as the additional volume (350 ccm) are swept up four times smaller (which I also take into account the Wikipedia)
So in general we can say that this "extra cylinder", if it could be adjoined to the basic operating system of the twice the speed, with the same parameters as the pistons sucking friction should have only 88 cc. So the difference 350 - 88 = 262 ccm, otzymujemy for free, with my engine system ... We can say that in relation to its basic size 600 ccm. Friction has been reduced by as much as 43%. suction against displacement in the traditional way ...
With modesty will not ask where my 43/2 x 3000000000000 = 64 bilon $ .... which do not have the "Great" lecture every year on the 2% increase in efficiency ....

And the real efficiency gain can be easily demonstrated mathematically ...

And of course, what Daniel suggested must take place within the limits of reasonable operation of the engine...

I can understand a lot, even that can be
stunned silence, but not for so many years ...

Also understand that it may be hard to admit to the fact that I thought differently, but I think that should be a hit in the chest and publicly admit to mistakes. Because we all now see that the PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE engine can zoom in on a lot of ...

I think it is a step by step to resolve these problems, but probably need to order, then it will be easier for us to understand next.
2:40pm 08-07-2013
Photovoltaic cells, that to me is the free energy. And there must be a difference in temperature. It works even in space ... And what someone theories to fit yourself, it's less interesting and real ... This is the free energy from the point of view of macro ... the bigger picture the sun can therefore not diminished ...
A completely this theory is not correct, if a man's life and his fitness after eating we consider ... particularly growing humans, animals and plants ... with no entropy growth is not got nothing to do .. I think that the totalitarian doctrine that will explain myself ..

Here an example that even with a relatively small temperature difference, we get a lot of electricity directly .. Rights were created 200 years ago ... Learning a little forward by this time gone ...
Well, you do not need at all under the method of formation of electrical energy, go to steam .. and count of efficiency ..

2:39pm 08-07-2013
Attitude so short, the question is: Is the box acoustic guitar sound is the amplifier, without additional energy tied outside in to not connected to any electric guitar amplifier? or agree with me that this is the one amplifier? Please send me a short answer yes or no.
About the same answer about whether tuba (all brass instruments) is a sound amplifier die, in which the sound is created? Please answer yes or no is amplified ...

There is, of many different amplifiers without additional energy from the outside world around us ... Well, for example, a YAGI antenna or parabolic. And it strengthens both the transmitting and the receiving of signals ... always a strengthening ... At least to the strengthening of what we are interested in is successfully used .. without additional energy input. ,

Antena wiki

But follow on my way for .. Here he called the manufacturer produces an amplifier into the air ...


Coanda lift

2:31pm 08-07-2013
Well, now my professional work finally connected with engines or refrigerators :rolleyes:
Straight from Los Alamos....

I think you can use here too Amplifiers Sound, which do not receive ANY energy and strengthen sound. Such are the classic example of brass instruments.

Obvious example of sound reinforcement, without providing OF ANY energy from outside the acoustic guitar. Everyone knows that that plays a lot louder than the electric guitar is not connected to any amplifier ... (Board)

I think what would have happened if the thermoelectric acoustic generator strengthen the amplified acoustic sound that does not drain. Do you already know what I was thinking again? :rolleyes:

2:30pm 08-07-2013
Glider Jantar 1 :

maiden flight: 13.05.1972

wingspan: 19 m

wing profile: Fx-67 K-170 > Fx-67 K-150

own weight: 295 (+3) kg

total weight: 417 kg /515 kg (with the ballast)

The load area: 27,7 kG/m2/34,2 kG/m2 (with the ballast)

excellence: 47 at 95 km/h

the rate of descent: 0,50 m/s przy 75 km/h

minimum speed.: 60 km/h

Speed ??limit(Vne): 245 (230 with the ballast) km/h

Winch pulls the glider at the height of 1000 m. As one of the manufacturers of these winches such a cycle consumes 0.3 kg of fuel ....
The perfect glider = 47, a half-ton glider at the speed of 95 km / h while flying in a straight line, beat 47 km. or two such cycles, that is, 0.65 kg of fuel, it should run up ... 100 km at a speed of 95 km / h....
It seems to me that it should be entered in the book Guinness

2:29pm 08-07-2013
Glider, is such that 3 m ^ 2 front surface ...... windmill, which is 3 m ^ 2 has a diameter of about 2 meters .... of such a windmill, at a wind speed of 75 km / h, we get only around 500 watts of power. Now I do imagine that the 500 watt would raise a 500 kG glider at the height of 12 km in the Alps ....
You can see in this example, the energy is much more than that due to the "Law Betz"

Now, we can see that the glider is perfectly shaped, which makes it a true cross-section of recognition, drag, only 10% of the actual resistance of the cross-sectional plane ... or power that diligently received the windmill of the size is just ... about 20 watt .. And this power is expected to be a glider at the height of 12 km?


Messages: 121 until 135 of 418.
Number of pages: 28
Newer6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12Older