The owner of this guestbook has (temporarily) disabled adding new messages.
Message:

3:14pm 09-10-2011
pratik pradhan
its for me
1:47pm 09-08-2011
Feliks
Here PhotoStream proposal, which has improved aerodynamics and a little stiffness to the system add..



some histo:




http://www.new4stroke.com/percival.pdf

http://www.new4stroke.com/AIAA-Presentation.pdf

Andrew
3:41am 09-06-2011
Feliks




3:39am 09-06-2011
Feliks
Old ideas in new study:
This gear drive in a helicopter that is bothering me. Another way to get rid of her. By the way, turned out that the rear propeller and also you can get rid of , because the helicopter does not have the torque of the main propeller.
The helicopter had already been built. But it had drawbacks: no, for example, could not take full advantage of autorotation, because the propeller with a hole through the center did not have good aerodynamic properties....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sud-Ouest_Djinn

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Helicopter_Djinn_rotor_mast_and_blade.jpg
I missed this problem and the propeller is as it is most optimal.
Also today after assuming control of the helicopter adjustable nozzle (vectoring nozzle) on the outlet gases from the turbine driven, will be very precise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbomeca_Palouste

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0e/Engine_of_F-35.jpg
In summary the lack of a gear transmission and rear propeller helicopter will certainly reduce weight.



Andrew
10:54pm 08-22-2011
Feliks


Regards Andrew
1:31am 08-20-2011
Larry
You just might of invented the rubix cube of engines. Very nice I'm a master mechanic and I see big potential !!
How much extra gas mileage is the system good for? I've got a great idea I'm a great salesman
Lets take it on the Canaidian show, Dragons Den,And get PPaid~! ?
12:53am 08-11-2011
Feliks
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/06/downwind-faster-than-the-wind





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing_faster_than_the_wind#Sailing_dead_downwind_faster_than_the_wind



Aerodynamic coefficient Cx is very small. It is certainly much smaller than in the traditional ship...

This is not a traditional sail 2D, but the full 3D structure. Energy is processed and used to drive water propeller. Why can swim backwards and forwards. Like a film with 2D fan.
So many of Snoopy Ship has a much higher efficiency due to 3D

Andrew
3:13pm 08-05-2011
Feliks
[QUOTE=Mr. Clarkson;72899489]Indeed it is

[/QUOTE]

The Multisnoopy Ship

This is Beautiful..

This is the modern variant of a sailing ship... so that the sails are not torn...

Regards Andrew
3:10pm 08-05-2011
Feliks


Andrew
9:18pm 07-30-2011
Feliks
Snoopy inspired me..

First, the architects built the pyramids, then the rectangular houses. Now for the houses in the shape of airfoil





Regards Andrew

9:16pm 07-30-2011
Feliks
Concrete is a pile of stones, only a tiny...

If we use the design of computers, calculators to calculate the type,
http://www.flowmeterdirectory.com/flowmeter_venturi_calc.html
http://www.hanleyinnovations.com/vf50.html

It can be 100% clean design
And even more politely 'll gain energy. And then it will be possible, for the next 4000 years.

Andrew
2:24am 07-25-2011
Feliks
In other forum:
[quote=Vicegrip;362904]Correct if you calulate based on single lift pulse per wing cycle. Bees get 2 lifts per wing cycle. People used to think the earth was flat and at the the center too.

Please to let us know how to make complex structures that are both strong enough to self suport and to resist 4000 years of storms? We simple people can see how a simple shape pile of rocks could last in an area that does not see sub 0C temps. Now all you need to do is figure out how to make electricity from a pile of rocks.[/quote]

The pile of rocks:



[quote=BlackTalon;363012]Hmmm, as someone with a structural engineering background, I see potential problems with that structure [/quote]

[quote=Lupin..the..3rd;363013]Needs more rocks.[/quote]

[quote=Vicegrip;363015]No, I think it needs less air.[/quote]

And I have hope that over the last 4,000 years we have learned, to build something more than just the pyramids and the pyramids....

Andrew
2:21am 07-25-2011
Feliks
[quote]

Instead, we can build an automatic flow of balls so that they can be sucked into the pipe.
A falling ball (or WATER) with wings, they can hit their way back after a shoulder wheel, similar to a water wheel, giving him his potential energy ..

Well, the automatic circuit, will cause the "Hercules" he can rest.
This is just an example of how we can use another way of generating energy this way.
[/quote]

"The Water Wind Power Plant"

Love for "tuning" not gone...



Andrew
2:17am 07-25-2011
Feliks
[/quote]
The main energies supplied to a glider is gravity and convection(solar) energy. Even a glider has to be able to change it's vector to operate at a gain. At the end of the day, a glider has produced very little work. If you were to try to power the world on the work performed levels of a glider, it would be a herculean task.[/QUOTE]

You know perfectly well, with new ideas about the rank of the fundamental, very difficult to penetrate to the use of mass...

But thanks to people like you, we can slowly try to..
Another, although not looking as Hekules, we have on video..



Instead, we can build an automatic flow of balls so that they can be sucked into the pipe.
A falling ball (or WATER) with wings, they can hit their way back after a shoulder wheel, similar to a water wheel, giving him his potential energy ..

Well, the automatic circuit, will cause the "Hercules" he can rest.
This is just an example of how we can use another way of generating energy this way.

Regards Andrew
1:24am 07-17-2011
Feliks
Here you can see perfectly that we can get plenty of potential energy generated by the aerodynamics, without any propellers....
It allows a range of up to 3000 km by glider...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliding

Andrew
Messages: 211 until 225 of 421.
Number of pages: 29
Newer12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18Older